BytePlus Coding Plus Telegram
Use this playbook when coding traffic should stay on the dedicated BytePlus Coding lane while Telegram owns the lightweight live reply-loop surface. This page keeps three boundaries explicit:- BytePlus general traffic and BytePlus Coding traffic are not the same lane
- Telegram is a shipped runtime-backed bot surface
- gateway ownership only comes after the Telegram loop already works
When This Is The Right Playbook
- coding quota or pricing should stay on the dedicated coding route
- one Telegram bot should own the reply loop
- you still want a separate general BytePlus profile available for other work
- the team wants explicit profile switching instead of one profile being rewritten repeatedly
Use A Different Playbook If
Step 1: Keep General And Coding Profiles Separate
byteplusbelongs to the general/api/v3lanebyteplus_codingbelongs to/api/coding/v3- keeping both profiles visible is cleaner than patching one profile back and forth with ad-hoc route overrides
Step 2: Confirm The Active Coding Lane
active_provider deliberately instead of changing the kind on the active
profile in place.
Step 3: Add The Telegram Bot Surface
Single-account config:allowed_chat_idsis the trust boundary- Telegram is the smallest runtime-backed reply-loop lane in the current public docs set
Step 4: Move To Named Bot Accounts If Needed
If one config should hold several Telegram identities, move to named accounts before introducing gateway selectors.Step 5: Choose Foreground Or Persisted Ownership
Foreground loop:Troubleshooting
Continue Reading
- Continue to Common Setups for the setup hub.
- Continue to Provider Guides for the full built-in provider matrix.
- Continue to Provider Recipes for the provider-only recipe set.
- Continue to Channel Guides for the full shipped channel matrix.
- Continue to Channel Recipes for the channel-only recipe set.